Spazzycat101
GryphonABLaZ(E). Lawful chaotic good
<p>
Those 'simple,' 'casual' and 'detailed' things that go before the title of a roleplay. Has anyone noticed how misused they are, particularly in the fantasy section? I mean, I'm just thinking out loud here, but they're quite clearly defined at the top of each forum above the threads. I'm just wondering if I'm not the only one seeing this. The 'simple' definition thing is all fine and dandy, anyone at all can hop on in. There's no writing limit, that's where you're roleplaying for the sake of roleplaying. That isn't misused, it's actually hard for that title to be. Then the 'casual' definition. This is really the idea behind this thread/vent, because so many roleplays that would better fit under the 'simple' title are given that of 'casual.' It is clearly stated by Staff-chan that casual RPs are ones in which the players might push to improve their writing, and there is roughly a one-paragraph minimum. A <em>one</em> <em>paragraph minimum</em>. Too often though, I browse through those to find (now, maybe I'm the only one picky about common grammar and spelling mistakes, but I personally think that the care that is put into the use of vocabulary and the like can really define what kind of writer that person is-- share your thoughts on that, too! After all, that's kind of maybe sort of what I'm making this thread for >.>) the overview tab empty, and the first IC post to be four lines long on a small computer screen. Now, the detailed roleplays are pretty self-explanatory, and only occasionally have I seen them misused. Those guys are fine. What are your thoughts, do you think it's an honest issue that needs to be addressed? I've only really seen it in the fantasy section and maybe a little in the realistic. The reason I find it stressful is that I'd like to find a good fantasy roleplay with some good lore, but not something where the writing is too lengthy at that point. Just something to click to when I need to write something for the sake of writing something. I also have a roleplay idea, and I'd like to run it through a few test-runs to get a handle on progressing plot and similar things, but I'd be reluctant to list it as detailed because it's really just a prototype. There's a huge rift between casual and detailed roleplays now. Some casual roleplays fit properly into that title, but the vast majority do not and make it difficult to find those that do. Sorry for the big rambling rant of sorts, ^^" it's just something that's been pecking at my nerves. And if you read the entire post, then thanks for caring to read such a ridiculously long thing! Now about your opinions? Do you find this to be an issue yourself? Just... Eh! <em>-flails arms-</em> Share! Words, words, opinions, share them! Meh!
</p>
Those 'simple,' 'casual' and 'detailed' things that go before the title of a roleplay. Has anyone noticed how misused they are, particularly in the fantasy section? I mean, I'm just thinking out loud here, but they're quite clearly defined at the top of each forum above the threads. I'm just wondering if I'm not the only one seeing this. The 'simple' definition thing is all fine and dandy, anyone at all can hop on in. There's no writing limit, that's where you're roleplaying for the sake of roleplaying. That isn't misused, it's actually hard for that title to be. Then the 'casual' definition. This is really the idea behind this thread/vent, because so many roleplays that would better fit under the 'simple' title are given that of 'casual.' It is clearly stated by Staff-chan that casual RPs are ones in which the players might push to improve their writing, and there is roughly a one-paragraph minimum. A <em>one</em> <em>paragraph minimum</em>. Too often though, I browse through those to find (now, maybe I'm the only one picky about common grammar and spelling mistakes, but I personally think that the care that is put into the use of vocabulary and the like can really define what kind of writer that person is-- share your thoughts on that, too! After all, that's kind of maybe sort of what I'm making this thread for >.>) the overview tab empty, and the first IC post to be four lines long on a small computer screen. Now, the detailed roleplays are pretty self-explanatory, and only occasionally have I seen them misused. Those guys are fine. What are your thoughts, do you think it's an honest issue that needs to be addressed? I've only really seen it in the fantasy section and maybe a little in the realistic. The reason I find it stressful is that I'd like to find a good fantasy roleplay with some good lore, but not something where the writing is too lengthy at that point. Just something to click to when I need to write something for the sake of writing something. I also have a roleplay idea, and I'd like to run it through a few test-runs to get a handle on progressing plot and similar things, but I'd be reluctant to list it as detailed because it's really just a prototype. There's a huge rift between casual and detailed roleplays now. Some casual roleplays fit properly into that title, but the vast majority do not and make it difficult to find those that do. Sorry for the big rambling rant of sorts, ^^" it's just something that's been pecking at my nerves. And if you read the entire post, then thanks for caring to read such a ridiculously long thing! Now about your opinions? Do you find this to be an issue yourself? Just... Eh! <em>-flails arms-</em> Share! Words, words, opinions, share them! Meh!
</p>
Last edited by a moderator: