TeaMMatE11
The Ninja. Now you see me, Now you don't.
Ok. Well. Here we go.
the reasons here I state are PC specific, I think.
No Man's Sky. Space exploration. Combat. Essentially a space version of minecraft. What's not to love? A procedurally generated world, nearly a limitless universe.
Here's my 2 cents why I think No Man's Sky dun goofed.
1) Framerate stability. Console players, this doesn't really apply to you. But for us PC gamers...well...the frame rate drop is pretty terrible. You go from a smooth 60 to under 30.
2) The devs are a bunch of liars, promising that you could encounter people's ships, when it is only a singleplayer game.
3) The worlds are supposedly unique, but they're not that unique in the sense that the planets are retextured versions of themselves.
4) The price. An indie game for a AAA price. I'd rather go play Elite: Dangerous for $20 bucks, with AAA graphics and a stable game. (No joke, Elite: Dangerous is almost the same thing as No Man's Sky.)
I think this is the worst game launch I'be seen since Battlefield 3.
Don't get me wrong; it's a great game for the same reasons minecraft is appealing; it's an open world sandbox. The closest game I can think of is Mount and Blade: Warband, except in space. I say this: good concept, terrible execution.
But for above reasons (and hopefully get patched later down the line), it's just not worth the money or time.
the reasons here I state are PC specific, I think.
No Man's Sky. Space exploration. Combat. Essentially a space version of minecraft. What's not to love? A procedurally generated world, nearly a limitless universe.
Here's my 2 cents why I think No Man's Sky dun goofed.
1) Framerate stability. Console players, this doesn't really apply to you. But for us PC gamers...well...the frame rate drop is pretty terrible. You go from a smooth 60 to under 30.
2) The devs are a bunch of liars, promising that you could encounter people's ships, when it is only a singleplayer game.
3) The worlds are supposedly unique, but they're not that unique in the sense that the planets are retextured versions of themselves.
4) The price. An indie game for a AAA price. I'd rather go play Elite: Dangerous for $20 bucks, with AAA graphics and a stable game. (No joke, Elite: Dangerous is almost the same thing as No Man's Sky.)
I think this is the worst game launch I'be seen since Battlefield 3.
Don't get me wrong; it's a great game for the same reasons minecraft is appealing; it's an open world sandbox. The closest game I can think of is Mount and Blade: Warband, except in space. I say this: good concept, terrible execution.
But for above reasons (and hopefully get patched later down the line), it's just not worth the money or time.