Ryik
An Immaterial Phantasm Adrift Amidst Annihilation
Bleh.nerdyfangirl said:Now on to the original point as @ApfelSeine is correct it's mostly put in romance roleplays to ensure that their can be sufficient amount of pairings to help move the plot forward. When a roleplay is specifically about people hooking up than it makes sense for their sexuality to be used as that's directly relevant to the plot.
Maybe it's just me, but I think of pre-determined, created-in-advance pairings as stifling. I can see where it has its place because some roleplays need pairings to have the plot get along, but it was not my intention to refer to them.
Particularly, the Fandom, Fantasy, Futuristic, and some Realistic/Modern RPs, who want romance but don't have a setting primarily focused on it, is what peeves me. It disrupts the organic relationships - doomed or successful, developed IC.
What I really dislike is that people tend to act on the information in a CS when their character shouldn't.nerdyfangirl said:And a character sheet is designed primarily just to be a reference point for the GM and the player to ensure that a player character fits into a roleplay. So yes sometimes that might give rise to so called "useless" information - or information put into a CS that does not affect the plot or roleplay. But remember your character is supposed to be an actual living person in the roleplay universe.
So they should probably have a favorite color or a favorite food. And some idea of their sexuality. Does that mean those things are important to the roleplay? Not but they are little pieces that make your character seem like a more realized person.
Not saying I won't scrap the lot if it was me personally. But I'm not going to really fuss if someone else has me write them out for my character either.
The GM I often trust, other roleplayers I can't say the same about.CloudyBlueDay said:In short, my opinion is that if you feel you can trust the GM, there is no wrong option to put on a CS, and if you don't agree with something there, don't join the rp.
Don't get me wrong, shipping your character with one stated to have an incompatible sexuality by virtue of what your characters' tastes are supposed to be isn't exactly intuitive, but this would often be the way a character redefines their sexuality, and characters lose their eligibility for this because it's so uncommon for someone to ship in that way.
I know I'm nitpicking to call it metagaming, and even I am probably guilty of it at times, but I'd rather keep the knowledge safe from anyone who might use it.
Last edited by a moderator: