Phantom Thief of Hearts
We live in the Metal Gear timeline
define strategy gamesstrategy games
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
define strategy gamesstrategy games
XCOM (the old ones), Warhammer (I used to play IRL Warhammer but its quite expensive and time consuming nowadays), games like Rimworld and so on.define strategy games
Those are still considered Fandoms... I don't know where you get the idea that they don't count.XCOM (the old ones), Warhammer (I used to play IRL Warhammer but its quite expensive and time consuming nowadays), games like Rimworld and so on.
Yeah but they aren't fandoms you can RP properly - not even in a multifandom. Most of the time there isn't even any characters from them to play as.Those are still considered Fandoms... I don't know where you get the idea that they don't count.
They still count as a fandom, since they actually have fans.Yeah but they aren't fandoms you can RP properly - not even in a multifandom. Most of the time there isn't even any characters from them to play as.
I'm well aware of that, but it doesn't mean all fandoms can/should be RPed. Besides, since there are no characters from the sort of games I play, at best you'd get OCs which typically end up being self-inserts, at worst you'll get OP characters using mechanics from a vague strategy game in an attempt to verify their character.They still count as a fandom, since they actually have fans.
I'm not saying they're RPable Fandoms, I'm saying it's still a fandomI'm well aware of that, but it doesn't mean all fandoms can/should be RPed. Besides, since there are no characters from the sort of games I play, at best you'd get OCs which typically end up being self-inserts, at worst you'll get OP characters using mechanics from a vague strategy game in an attempt to verify their character.
I know that, but that isn't the question asked here. The question is which characters do you like, and do you RP as them - not 'would you consider strategy games as fandoms or not'.I'm not saying they're RPable Fandoms, I'm saying it's still a fandom
I still don't see the point of bringing that bit up, when you could have kept it simple. Just saying.I know that, but that isn't the question asked here. The question is which characters do you like, and do you RP as them - not 'would you consider strategy games as fandoms or not'.
I did keep it simple, by saying which characters I play, why I play them over any other character and why my characters tend to be from older franchises - I play old characters because I don't play new games, as I play strategy games primarily. At least, I think that's pretty simple. You're the one who decided to pull apart my reasoning, which to be honest can't say I'm overly fond of you doing. My reasoning is my own and frankly you seem to be trying to make my personal opinion invalid by talking about semantics.I still don't see the point of bringing that bit up, when you could have kept it simple. Just saying.
I don't know where you get the idea of me trying to invalidate your opinion. Because I thought you meant Chess or Checkers when you said Strategy Games.I did keep it simple, by saying which characters I play, why I play them over any other character and why my characters tend to be from older franchises - I play old characters because I don't play new games, as I play strategy games primarily. At least, I think that's pretty simple. You're the one who decided to pull apart my reasoning, which to be honest can't say I'm overly fond of you doing. My reasoning is my own and frankly you seem to be trying to make my personal opinion invalid by talking about semantics.
Yeah but they aren't fandoms you can RP properly - not even in a multifandom. Most of the time there isn't even any characters from them to play as.
Both settings have tabletop RPGs. They've had them since the eighties. Roleplaying Warhammer in any incarnation shouldn't be a problem. 'Cept maybe Blood Bowl, that might take some effort.You can't roleplay Warhammer properly? Is that what you're suggesting? I started forum roleplaying with 40k roleplays, and would gladly jump in a quality one today. Both 40k and Warhammer fantasy are ready made settings for group RPs.
I'm pretty sure Warhammer have characters in its lore.Both settings have tabletop RPGs. They've had them since the eighties. Roleplaying Warhammer in any incarnation shouldn't be a problem. 'Cept maybe Blood Bowl, that might take some effort.
I blame New 52 for the current portrayals of Harley. It's easier to sell she-deadpool meme queen to people who have never read a comic than a character with depth, somehow.I'd say that things like XCOM and Warhammer (or indeed factions in general) can certainly be RPed, you just need to go about it carefully or you end up just making a mess.
I don't want to call anyone out but I've seen Warhammer 40K factions in particular handled so badly in some RPs that I was almost put off that entire universe, and I know people who were put of said universe completely. That's just sad.
In terms of who I actually RP, I do tend to stick to OCs as it's a case of "Well, I can't screw up writing a character I've made myself" However, the self-insert thing has only really been played for laughs.
I've played John Constantine and the 10th Doctor in a good number of RPs as well as Grand Admiral Thrawn and Deadpool on occasion but the character I've played the most on this site is probably Injustice Harley Quinn.
In my opinion, she's the best version of the character (especially if you read the comics, which I highly recommend). There's the funny side, yes and playing a character that's a bit nuts is always fun but there's a deeper level to her which is interesting to explore. I think anyone that wants to write for a good version of Quinn should at least acknowledge the horrific nature of the abusive relationship...
Hooray I'm not the only one who despises most of the New 52 stuff!I blame New 52 for the current portrayals of Harley. It's easier to sell she-deadpool meme queen to people who have never read a comic than a character with depth, somehow.
That's most people, friend.Hooray I'm not the only one who despises most of the New 52 stuff!
I didn't like how salty he was about people saying he talks to fish. Surely, the king of the sea should have thicker skin. It was like one of those old Cartoon Network promos, except in the context of the real comics, played more straight.New 52 Aquaman is one of the best (if not the best) runs of the character.
I didn't like how salty he was about people saying he talks to fish. Surely, the king of the sea should have thicker skin. It was like one of those old Cartoon Network promos, except in the context of the real comics, played more straight.
My friend tells me it gets better after that. I should probably give it a full look.
I get why people would like it. It just isn't my speed.Did you read the entire issue? He was marginalized and ridiculed most of the first book. Geoff Johns single handily injected credibility into the most disrespected superhero in mainstream comics. I don't think anyone else could have done it so quickly and effectively.
Hooray I'm not the only one who despises most of the New 52 stuff!
I blame New 52 for the current portrayals of Harley. It's easier to sell she-deadpool meme queen to people who have never read a comic than a character with depth, somehow.
I get why people would like it. It just isn't my speed.
Wasn't a fan of Geoff's Shazam, either.