Wholeheartedly I agree, undead nightmare is a perfect example of dlc. I want to play it now aha.. shame it was traded for that mediocre mess that still somehow holds a place in my heart. Fallout 4. *dies inside*
I’d have to go back and look (admittedly I had forgotten some since I haven’t been on in awhile), and refresh my memory and all that stuff. But one thing that came to my mind right now was that the M1 Carbine’s front sight post hood is circular (like the Gewehr 43) when in reality, the front sight post was similar to the Garand. There’s more, I’d just need to go back and refresh my memory.
I know! They should have had Gewehr 43’s, not SVT-40’s! I love the G43, and I’ve been looking to buy one myself for awhile now (too expensive for me at the moment though).
Money, I believe they were thinking of money.
It's really weird to play a game where one of the best SMGS comes from a place not even seen ingame. If SHG fixed a lot of the weapon flaws in WWII, their balance problem can easily be fixed. Hate quickscopers? Instead of jamming one clip through the side of the rifle, the bullets must be loaded individually. And if you have extended mags, have fun with that. Hate SMG fests? With extended mags, allow a soldier to only carry one other drum for his PPSH. I mean like these small details can solve so many balance issues SHG can actually focus on delivering a. Free content and b. Good content.
Perhaps. Seeing the greed of publishers these days, pretty much requiring microtransactions, that’s most likely the case. It’s really sad the gaming industry has come to this.
Yeah, this really could have helped the game. They didn’t focus on stuff like this. I don’t know if they will. I hope so. But the gaming industry is so greedy these days. It’s all about money. Games are being ruined. I wish this would happen to WWII.
I do agree that the current state of gaming involves paying more for the piece of the pie is sad, but half of this falls on the consumer. Guys, capitalism 101: If people aren't playing games because of lootboxes, companies remove lootboxes in order to gain customers. People don't play games because of a lack of content, companies add content into the game. In addition, and concerning the call of duty community in general, is the reason why WWII could be a lot better. For over 10 years this series has existed, nobody has ever been united in what makes a current game bad. "The game is too futuristic! I want boots on the ground!" Here's boots on the ground pal. "Shotguns are overpowered in MW3!" The shotguns proceed to get nerfed into the ground. It's this constant bickering and anger from 12 year olds and soymen that all three devs, (Treyarch, SHG and Infinity Ward) are constantly freaking out on what to add to a game that isn't even the Dev's game anymore. Can you really blame SHG for not lending out gifts during Christmas and the Winter Siege event to a community who can't even decide what they want? Not only do devs have to deal with a community that sends death-threats to their staff for attempting to balance the game, but it's the rise of E-sports and youtubers. E-sports has been around since the 90's (I believe) but as the years pass, it grows bigger and bigger and even dwarfs ESPN. Combine this with an angery community and the fact you have to make maps quick paced for E-sports and you have a bad problem for your business. And can we seriously realize that youtubers have TREMENDOUS impact on the call of duty games? Even if you don't like COD youtubers, you have to admit they probably bring the most amount of advertising to the COD series and new players. Also, we even have to thank Drift0r for nerfing the dual barreled shotguns in COD WWII, even though I personally really like the guy. So, now that we see we have a volatile community to start with, E-sports, and youtubers, it's really hard to blame SHG and all of the devs to an extent the current state of the series, and really most AAA games on the market. I think if we as consumers really want to see a change in the current stage of gaming, either stop watching E-sports, stop supporting COD Youtubers (especially those who waste 100s of dollars on luteboxes), or even better, unify the customer demographics into a set list of what everyone wants to see in future or current games. Now that I've wrapped all this up, do I think SHG and Condery are saints and completely exempt from critisicm? No! But you as a consumer helped create COD WWII whether you like it or not.
been killing yahtzees I N T H E W O M B
I feel like operations can really incentivize people to keep playing the game. For example if during the summer, SHG decides to add a new War map and some weapons or camoflauge in memory of the Anzio or Africa landings, and double division XP or double armory credits if they decide to add them into the game, the player counts would skyrocket. I'm really hoping once the Resistence DLC comes along there's a LOT of new content added into the game. COD WWII needs to stop being so pedestrian and be ambitious, even if nobody likes it.
No one cares, bud. it's a CoD game. you want realism, play Arma.
Yeah, but condrey said he was trying to make the game historically accurate.
Michael Condery is responsible for making the game, dude. The head honcho. And he's responsible for content and stuff in the game after launch.
All I can say to you is this. CoD has never been realistic in combat. they make arcade-y multiplayer and theatric, cinematic campaigns.
Yeah, Ghosts was fun because there were a lot of fun things you can do: be a dog, sneak through the Venezuelan forest with a pistol and knife and hope to not be captured by the OPFOR, sink a battleship, go into space, etc. Although the story could have a lot more emotion and... better voice acting. I was always confused as to why the multiplayer was hated on. It was a nice change of pace from the standard perk system and weapon meta: everything had its place and you can customize your perk deck to fit your playstyle.
