STs, Get In Here

[Grey]

I have found a wonderful site called Fail Forward, which curates links to articles about roleplaying, and so far this stuff is gold. One I really liked and will use in future:


http://lookrobot.co.uk/2013/11/25/two-factions-run-better-games-players-without-knowing/

 

[The Dark Wizard]

I have found a wonderful site called Fail Forward, which curates links to articles about roleplaying, and so far this stuff is gold. One I really liked and will use in future:
http://lookrobot.co.uk/2013/11/25/two-factions-run-better-games-players-without-knowing/

This is certainly interesting!


Thanks for the resource

 

[Shining Lotus Sage]

This is a good idea. I get a lot of the same use out of social backgrounds, but not every system uses those.

 

[WlfSamurai]

Wow, @Grey, this is a great resource. Thanks so much!


And that post is fantastic. Gonna give it a try.

 

[Grey]

Glad you guys find it useful. It's funny I found it, because I was recently stressing the point to some young 'uns at a panel on game writing recently - only make your players roll if the consequences of failure are as interesting and driving to the plot as those for success. Just an application of failing forward.

 

[WlfSamurai]

I like to stick to "say yes or roll the dice." If it's not a conflict that matters, say "yes" or "yes, but..."

 

[Thorn Darkblade]

I'm gonna implement this idea tomorrow in my D&D game

 

[SephirothSage]

I like.

 

[MDL]

That's very useful