Flagg
The Most Electrifying Man in Sports Entertainment
I'm thinking that there must be minor (or not so minor) Artifacts in existence to verify the authenticity of written documents, as proof against alteration or forgery.
However, I'm having trouble coming up with any clever ideas. Care to lend some of your own?
I do have an idea for something that works kind of like public key encryption: paired sets of quills and spectacles. The words written by the quill are completely illegible and nonsensical to anyone but the wearer of the spectacles. Correspondents would arrange in advance for each party to have both a quill, and set of specs that paired with the other, and thus could pass letters back and forth without fear of interception by enemy agents or nosy messengers.
This however, is a separate, though related, idea. It doesn't guarantee that the letter you're reading was penned by the person it claims to have been, just that they had the right writing instrument.
Thoughts?
-S
However, I'm having trouble coming up with any clever ideas. Care to lend some of your own?
I do have an idea for something that works kind of like public key encryption: paired sets of quills and spectacles. The words written by the quill are completely illegible and nonsensical to anyone but the wearer of the spectacles. Correspondents would arrange in advance for each party to have both a quill, and set of specs that paired with the other, and thus could pass letters back and forth without fear of interception by enemy agents or nosy messengers.
This however, is a separate, though related, idea. It doesn't guarantee that the letter you're reading was penned by the person it claims to have been, just that they had the right writing instrument.
Thoughts?
-S