Search results for query: *

I don't know about everyone else, but my grandfather certainly gave me the evil eye. It was kinda painful at first, but I'm grateful he did because now I can see past the veil. BEYOND WHERE THE STARS LINGER AND WORLDS DIE Ahstu, nigh, astram...

@AlexneushoornTheGreat The 'sides' in a war are defined entirely and exclusively by who is fighting in those sides. There is no "side" to change to unless you swap only some members to the other side rather than all of them.

Swapped in what way? Because if you're just asking what would happen if the people on each side were on the other sides instead you'd just end up with the exact same two sides.

They can just use the same line.

I mean, all else constant humans would still have the exact same amount of time, just divided differently.

It's hard to pinpoint a line in the sand. I would say a significant portion of the personality, backstory and/or extra features (powers, items, this depends on the character) would be needed at minimum, and even then if it's just one of those it might not entirely qualify (for example if the...

What I've done is the exact opposite of being vague, I'm striving to choose words that indicate as precisely as possible what I mean. If I think something is a universal rule I will state that it is, if I think something is merely something which tends to happen, then I will will use words like...

No it isn't. You're making a false dichotomy here: All I stated is that the criteria behind re-using a character is not typically it's reception but the character user's own attachment to it. In fact I've precisely made a point of never asserting the thing you're suggesting I did, as I do...

Counterpoint: No they're not. Not 'usually' as far as I've seen anyways. Most have a fair amount of work put into them, most of that group in turn have thought put into them too, but (again as far as I've seen) the vast majority of re-used characters either fall into the "this was part of...